One of the objections many developers have to the ASP.NET programming model is that it is not a "true MVC" (Model-View-Controller) implementation, because controller-type logic within the page is too tightly coupled to the view. A good example of this are event handlers within the page class, which typically have references to view elements, such as input controls, all over the place. Without getting into academic discussion of what "true MVC" is, and whether it is even appropriate to try to fit form-based technology such as ASP.NET into traditionally request-based MVC pattern when MVP (Model-View-Presenter) or Presentation Model might be more appropriate, we'd like to agree with the critics on the most important point they are making: controller-type logic, such as the code within page event handlers in ASP.NET, should not depend on the view elements.
Having said that, there are good things about ASP.NET. Server-side forms and controls make developers significantly more productive and allow us to significantly simplify page markup. They also make cross-browser issues easier to deal with, as each control can make sure that it renders correct markup based on the user's browser. The ability to hook custom logic into the lifecycle of the page, as well as to customize HTTP processing pipeline are also very powerful features. Finally, being able to interact with the strongly typed server-side controls instead of manipulating string-based HTTP request collections, such as Form and QueryString, is a much needed layer of abstraction in web development.
For these reasons, we decided that instead of developing a new, "pure and true MVC" web framework as part of Spring.NET, we should take a more pragmatic approach and extend ASP.NET in such a way that most, if not all of its shortcomings are eliminated. It should be noted that with the introduction of a 'true MVC framework' being added to .NET, with extension points for IoC containers such as Spring, Spring will continue to play a role within a MVC based model once that functionality is available from Microsoft. It is worth noting that Spring Java has a very popular MVC framework and much of that experience and added value can be transliterated to help developers be more productive when using the upcoming ASP.NET MVC support.
As we said earlier, event handlers in code-behind classes really
should not have to deal with ASP.NET UI controls directly. Such event
handlers should rather work with the presentation model of the page,
represented either as a hierarchy of domain objects or an ADO.NET
DataSet. It is for that reason that the Spring.NET
team implemented bidirectional data binding framework to handle the
mapping of values to and from the controls on a page to the underlying
data model. The data binding framework also transparently takes care of
data type conversion and formatting, enabling application developers to
work with fully typed data (domain) objects in the event handlers of
code-behind files. See Bidirectional Data
Binding and Model Management for more information.
The flow of control through an application is another area of
concern that is addressed by Spring.NET Web Framework. Typical ASP.NET
applications will use Response.Redirect or
Server.Transfer calls within
Page logic to navigate to an appropriate page after
an action is executed. This typically leads to hard-coded target URLs in
the Page, which is never a good thing. Result
mapping solves this problem by allowing application developers to specify
aliases for action results that map to target URLs based on information in
an external configuration file that can easily be edited. Under
consideration for future releases of Spring.NET is a process management
framework, which will take this approach to another level, allowing you to
control complex page flows in a very simple way. See Result Mapping for more
information.
Standard localization support is also limited in versions of ASP.NET
prior to ASP.NET 2.0. Even though Visual Studio 2003 generates a local
resource file for each ASP.NET Page and user
control, those resources are never used by the ASP.NET infrastructure.
This means that application developers have to deal directly with resource
managers whenever they need access to localized resources, which in the
opinion of the Spring.NET team should not be the case. Spring.NET's Web
Framework (hereafter referred to as Spring.Web) adds comprehensive support
for localization using both local resource files and global resources that
are configured within and for a Spring.NET container. See Localization and Message Sources for
more information.
Spring.Web also adds support for applying the dependency injection
principle to one's ASP.NET Pages and
Controls as well as http modules and custom
provider modules. This means that application developers can easily inject
service dependencies into web controllers by leveraging the power of the
Spring.NET IoC container. See Dependency Injection
for ASP.NET Pages for more information.
In addition to the aforementioned features that can be considered to be the 'core' features of the Spring.Web framework, Spring.Web also ships with a number of other lesser features that might be useful to a large number of application developers. Some of these additional features include back-ports of ASP.NET 2.0 features that can be used with ASP.NET 1.1, such as Master Page support. See Master Pages in ASP.NET 1.1 for more information.
In order to implement some of the above mentioned features the
Spring.NET team had to extend (as in the object-oriented sense) the
standard ASP.NET Page and
UserControl classes. This means that in order to
take advantage of the full feature stack of
Spring.Web (most notably bidirectional data binding, localization and
result mapping), your code-behind classes will have to extend Spring.Web
specific base classes such as Spring.Web.UI.Page;
however, some very powerful features such as dependency injection for
ASP.NET Pages, Controls, and providers can be leveraged without having to
extend Spring.Web-specific base classes. It is worth stating that by
taking advantage of some of the more useful features
offered by Spring.Web you will be coupling the presentation tier of your
application(s) to Spring.Web. The choice of whether or not this is
appropriate is, of course, left to you.
Finally, please be aware that the standard Spring.NET distribution (as of v1.1) ships with a number of Web QuickStarts and a complete reference application, SpringAir. Web QuickStarts are the best way to learn each Spring.Web feature by following simple examples, and the SpringAir reference application has a Spring.Web-enabled frontend which uses many best practices for Spring.NET web applications, so please do refer to it as you are reading this (reference) material (see Chapter 33, SpringAir - Reference Application).
Unsurprisingly, Spring.Web builds on top of the Spring.NET IoC
container, and makes heavy use (internally) of the easy pluggability and
standardized configuration afforded by the IoC container. This also
means that all of the controllers (ASP.NET Pages)
that make up a typical Spring.Web enabled application will be configured
using the same standard Spring.NET XML configuration syntax. Spring.Web
uses a custom PageHandlerFactory implementation
to load and configure a Spring.NET IoC container, which is in turn used
to locate an appropriate Page to handle a HTTP
request. The WebSupportModule configures
miscellaneous Spring infrastructure classes for use in a web
environment, for example setting the storage strategy of
LogicalThreadContext to be
HybridContextStorage.
The instantiation and configuration of the Spring.NET IoC
container by the Spring.Web infrastructure is wholly transparent to
application developers, who will typically never have to explicitly
instantiate and configure an IoC container manually (by for example
using the new operator in C#). In order to effect the
transparent bootstrapping of the IoC container, the Spring.Web
infrastructure requires the insertion of the following configuration
snippet into each and every Spring.Web-enabled web application's root
Web.config file (the verb and
path properties can of course be changed from the
values that are shown below):
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.aspx" type="Spring.Web.Support.PageHandlerFactory, Spring.Web"/>
</httpHandlers>
<httpModules>
<add name="Spring" type="Spring.Context.Support.WebSupportModule, Spring.Web"/>
</httpModules>
...
</system.web>
Please note that this snippet of standard ASP.NET configuration is
only required to be present in the root directory
of each Spring.Web web application (i.e. in the
web.config file present in the top level virtual
directory of an ASP.NET web application).
The above XML configuration snippet will direct the ASP.NET
infrastructure to use Spring.NET's page factory, which will in turn
create instances of the appropriate .aspx
Page, (possibly) inject dependencies into said
Page (as required), and then forward the handling
of the request to said Page.
After the Spring.Web page factory is configured, you will also
need to define a root application context by adding a Spring.NET
configuration section to that same web.config file.
The final configuration file should look a little like this (your exact
configuration will no doubt vary in particulars)...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<configSections>
<sectionGroup name="spring">
<section name="context" type="Spring.Context.Support.WebContextHandler, Spring.Web"/>
</sectionGroup>
</configSections>
<spring>
<context>
<resource uri="~/Config/CommonObjects.xml"/>
<resource uri="~/Config/CommonPages.xml"/>
<!-- TEST CONFIGURATION -->
<!--
<resource uri="~/Config/Test/Services.xml"/>
<resource uri="~/Config/Test/Dao.xml"/>
-->
<!-- PRODUCTION CONFIGURATION -->
<resource uri="~/Config/Production/Services.xml"/>
<resource uri="~/Config/Production/Dao.xml"/>
</context>
</spring>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.aspx" type="Spring.Web.Support.PageHandlerFactory, Spring.Web"/>
</httpHandlers>
<httpModules>
<add name="Spring" type="Spring.Context.Support.WebSupportModule, Spring.Web"/>
</httpModules>
</system.web>
</configuration>
There are a few important points that need to be noted with regard to the above configuration:
You must define a custom configuration section handler for the
spring/context element. If you use Spring.NET for
many applications on the same web server, it might be easier to move
the whole definition of the Spring.NET section group to your
machine.config file.
The custom configuration section handler is of the type
Spring.Context.Support.WebContextHandler
which will in turn instantiate an IoC container of the type
Spring.Context.Support.WebApplicationContext.
This will ensure that all of the features provided by Spring.Web are
handled properly (such as request and session-scoped object
definitions).
Within the <spring> element you need to define a root
context, and resource locations that contain the object definitions
that will be used within the web application (such as service or
business tier objects) then need to be specified as child elements
within the <context> element. Object definition resources can
be fully-qualified paths or URLs, or non-qualified, as in the
example above. Non-qualified resources will be loaded using the
default resource type for the context, which for the
WebApplicationContext is the
WebResource type.
Please note that the object definition resources do not all
have to be the same resource type (e.g. all
file://, all http://, all
assembly://, etc). This means that you can load
some object definitions from resources embedded directly within
application assemblies (assembly://), while
continuing to load other object definitions from web resources that
can be more easily edited.
The configuration for IIS7 is shown below
<system.webServer>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/>
<modules>
<add name="Spring" type="Spring.Context.Support.WebSupportModule, Spring.Web"/>
</modules>
<handlers>
<add name="SpringPageHandler" verb="*" path="*.aspx" type="Spring.Web.Support.PageHandlerFactory, Spring.Web"/>
<add name="SpringContextMonitor" verb="*" path="ContextMonitor.ashx" type="Spring.Web.Support.ContextMonitor, Spring.Web"/>
</handlers>
</system.webServer>ASP.NET provides a hierarchical configuration mechanism by allowing application developers to override configuration settings specified at a higher level in the web application directory hierarchy with configuration settings specified at the lower level.
For example, a web application's root
Web.config file overrides settings from the (lower
level) machine.config file. In the same fashion,
settings specified within the web.config file within
a subdirectory of a web application will override settings from the root
Web.config and so on. Lower level
Web.config files can also add settings of their own
that were not previously defined anywhere.
Spring.Web leverages this ASP.NET feature to provide support for a
context hierarchy. Your lower level Web.config files
can be used to add new object definitions or to override existing ones
per virtual directory.
What this means to application developers is that one can easily componentize an application by creating a virtual directory per component and creating a custom context for each component that contains the necessary configuration info for that particular context. The configuration for a lower level component will generally contain only those definitions for the pages that the component consists of and (possibly) overrides for some of the definitions from the root context (for example, menus).
Because each such lower level component will usually contain only
a few object definitions, application developers are encouraged to embed
those object definitions directly into the Web.config
for the lower level context instead of relying on an external resource
containing object definitions. This is easily accomplished by creating a
component Web.config similar to the following
one:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<configSections>
<sectionGroup name="spring">
<section name="objects" type="Spring.Context.Support.DefaultSectionHandler, Spring.Core"/>
</sectionGroup>
</configSections>
<spring>
<context type="Spring.Context.Support.WebApplicationContext, Spring.Web">
<resource uri="config://spring/objects"/>
</context>
<objects xmlns="http://www.springframework.net">
<object type="MyPage.aspx" parent="basePage">
<property name="MyRootService" ref="myServiceDefinedInRootContext"/>
<property name="MyLocalService" ref="myServiceDefinedLocally"/>
<property name="Results">
<!-- ... -->
</property>
</object>
<object id="myServiceDefinedLocally" type="MyCompany.MyProject.Services.MyServiceImpl, MyAssembly"/>
</objects>
</spring>
</configuration>The <context/> element seen above
(contained within the <spring/> element) simply
tells the Spring.NET infrastructure code to load (its) object
definitions from the spring/objects section of the
configuration file.
You can (and should) avoid the need to specify
<configSections/> element by moving the
configuration handler definition for the
<objects> element to a higher level (root)
Web.config file, or even to the level of the
machine.config file if Spring.NET is to be used for
multiple applications on the same server.
A very important point to be aware of is that this component-level context can reference definitions from its parent context(s). Basically, if a referenced object definition is not found in the current context, Spring.NET will search all the ancestor contexts in the context hierarchy until it finds said object definition (or ultimately fails and throws an exception).
Spring.Web builds on top of the feature set and capabilities of
ASP.NET; one example of this can be seen the way that Spring.Web has used
the code-behind class of the Page mechanism to
satisfy the Controller portion of the MVC architectural
pattern. In MVC-based (web) applications, the
Controller is typically a thin wrapper around one or
more service objects. In the specific case of Spring.Web, the Spring.NET
team realized that it was very important that service object dependencies
be easily injected into Page
Controllers. Accordingly, Spring.Web provides first
class support for dependency injection in ASP.NET
Pages. This allows application developers to inject
any required service object dependencies (and indeed any other
dependencies) into their Pages using standard
Spring.NET configuration instead of having to rely on custom service
locators or manual object lookups in a Spring.NET application
context.
Once an application developer has configured the Spring.NET web application context, said developer can easily create object definitions for the pages that compose that web application:
<objects xmlns="http://www.springframework.net">
<object id="basePage" abstract="true">
<property name="MasterPageFile" value="~/Web/StandardTemplate.master"/>
</object>
<object type="Login.aspx">
<property name="Authenticator" ref="authenticationService"/>
</object>
<object type="Default.aspx" parent="basePage"/>
</objects>This example contains three definitions:
The first definition is an abstract definition for the base page that many other pages in the application will inherit from. In this case, the definition simply specifies which page is to be referenced as the master page, but it will typically also configure localization-related dependencies and root folders for images, scripts and CSS stylesheets.
The second definition defines a login page that neither inherits
from the base page nor references the master page. What it does show
is how to inject a service object dependency into a page instance (the
authenticationService is defined elsewhere).
The final definition defines a default application page. In this case it simply inherits from the base page in order to inherit the master page dependency, but apart from that it doesn't need any additional dependency injection configuration.
One thing that slightly differentiates the configuration of ASP.NET
pages from the configuration of other .NET classes is in the value passed
to the type attribute. As can be seen in the above
configuration snippet the type name is actually the
path to the .aspx file for the
Page, relative to the directory context it is
defined in. In the case of the above example, those definitions are in the
root context so Login.aspx and
Default.aspx also must be in the root of the web
application's virtual directory. The master page is defined using an
absolute path because it could conceivably be referenced from child
contexts that are defined within subdirectories of the web
application.
The astute reader may have noticed that the definitions for the
Login and Default pages don't
specify either of the id and name
attributes. This is in marked contrast to typical object definitions in
Spring.NET, where the id or name
attributes are typically mandatory (although not always, as in the case of
inner object definitions). This is actually intentional, because in the
case of Spring.Web Page
Controller instances one typically wants to use the
name of the .aspx file name as the identifier. If an
id is not specified, the Spring.Web infrastructure will
simply use the name of the .aspx file as the object
identifier (minus any leading path information, and minus the file
extension too).
Of course, nothing prevents an application developer from specifying
an id or name value explicitly; one
use case when the explicit naming might be useful is when one wants to
expose the same page multiple times using a slightly different
configuration (Add / Edit pages for example).
Spring.Web also allows application developers to inject
dependencies into controls (both user controls and standard controls)
that are contained within a page. This can be accomplished globally for
all controls of a particular Type by using the
location of the .ascx as the object type identifier.
This is similar to injecting into .aspx pages shown
above.
<object type="~/controls/MyControl.ascx" abstract="true"> <!-- inject dependencies here... --> </object>
In either case, be sure to mark the object definition as
abstract (by adding
abstract="true" to the attribute list of the
<object/> element).
You can perform dependency injection on custom HTTP modules
through the use of the class
Spring.Context.Support.HttpApplicationConfigurer.
You register your custom HTTP module as you would normally, for example
a module of the type HtmlCommentAppenderModule,
taken from the Web Quickstart, appends additional comments into the http
response. It is registered as shown below
<httpModules> <add name="HtmlCommentAppender" type="HtmlCommentAppenderModule"/> </httpModules>
To configure this module, naming conventions are used to identify the module name with configuration instructions in the Spring configuration file. The ModuleTemplates property of HttpApplicationConfigurer is a dictionary that takes as a key the name of the HTTP module, HtmlCommentAppender, and as a value the configuration instructions as you would normally use for configuring an object with Spring. An example is shown below. HttpApplicationConfigurer' ModuleTemplates property.
<object name="HttpApplicationConfigurer" type="Spring.Context.Support.HttpApplicationConfigurer, Spring.Web">
<property name="ModuleTemplates">
<dictionary>
<entry key="HtmlCommentAppender"> <!-- this name must match the module name -->
<object>
<!-- select "view source" in your browser on any page to see the appended html comment -->
<property name="AppendText" value="My configured comment!" />
</object>
</entry>
</dictionary>
</property>
</object>You can see this example in action in the Web Quickstart.
Custom providers can be configured with Spring. The approach to configuration is a family of adapters that correspond 1-to-1 with the standard ASP.NET providers that are registered using the standard ASP.NET mechanism. The adapters inherit from their correspondingly named provider class in the BCL.
MembershipProviderAdapter
ProfileProviderAdapter
RoleProviderAdapter
SiteMapProviderAdapter
Here is an example of how to register the adapter for membership providers.
<membership defaultProvider="mySqlMembershipProvider">
<providers>
<clear/>
<add connectionStringName="" name="mySqlMembershipProvider" type="Spring.Web.Providers.MembershipProviderAdapter, Spring.Web"/>
</providers>
</membership>The name of the provider must match the name of the object in the spring configuration that will serve as the actual provider implementation. For convenience there are configurable versions of the providers found in ASP.NET so that you can use the full functionality of spring to configure these standard provider implementations, for example using property place holders, etc. These are
ConfigurableActiveDirectoryMembershipProvider
ConfigurableSqlMembershipProvider
ConfigurableSqlProfileProvider
ConfigurableSqlRoleProvider
ConfigurableXmlSiteMapProvider
Here is an example configuration taken from the Web Quickstart that simply sets the description property and connection string.
<object id="mySqlMembershipProvider" type="Spring.Web.Providers.ConfigurableSqlMembershipProvider">
<property name="connectionStringName" value="MyLocalSQLServer" />
<property name="parameters">
<name-values>
<add key="description" value="membershipprovider description" />
</name-values>
</property>
</object>Your own custom providers of course will contain additional configuration specific to your implementation.
There might be situations where it is necessary to customize Spring.Web's dependency injection processing. In particular when using GridViews, which create a large number of child controls, dependency injection can slow down your page. To overcome this problem, you may tell Spring to handle the dependency injection process yourself by implementing the interface ISupportsWebDependencyInjection as shown below:
[C#]
class MyControl : Control, ISupportsWebDependencyInjection
{
private IApplicationContext _defaultApplicationContext;
public IApplicationContext DefaultApplicationContext
{
get { return _defaultApplicationContext; }
set { _defaultApplicationContext = value; }
}
override protected AddedControl( Control control, int index )
{
// handle DI for children ourselves -
// defaults to a call to InjectDependenciesRecursive
WebUtils.InjectDependenciesRecursive( _defaultApplicationContext, control );
base.AddedControl( control, index );
}
}There is a Spring server control, Panel, that provides an easier way to turn of dependency injection for parts of your page. Example use is shown below
<spring:Panel runat="server" suppressDependencyInjection="true" renderContainerTag="false"> .. put your heavy controls here - they won't be touched by DI </spring:Panel>
By wrapping the performance sensitive parts of your page within this panel, you can easily turn off DI using the attribute suppressDependencyInjection. By default <spring:Panel/> won't render a container tag (<div>, <span>, etc.). You can modify this behavior by setting the attribute "renderContainerTag" accordingly.
Spring.NET web applications support an additional attribute within object definition elements that allows you to control the scope of an object:
<object id="myObject" type="MyType, MyAssembly" scope="application | session | request"/>
As you can see, there are three possible values for the scope attribute -- application, session or request. Application scope is the default, and will be used for all objects that don't have scope attribute defined. As its name says, it will result in a single instance of an object being created for the duration of the application, so it works exactly like the standard singleton objects in non-web applications. Session scope allows you to define objects in such a way that an instance is created for each HttpSession. This is the ideal scope for objects that you want bound to a single user such as user profile, shopping cart, etc. Request scope will result in a creation of an instance per HTTP request.
Unlike with prototype objects, calls to
IApplicationContext.GetObject will return the same
instance of the request-scoped object during a single HTTP request. This
allows you, for example, to inject the same request-scoped object into
multiple pages and then use server-side transfer to move from one page to
another. As all the pages are executed within the single HTTP request in
this case, they will share the same instance of the injected
object.
One thing to keep in mind is that objects can only reference other objects that are in the same or broader scope. This means that application-scoped objects can only reference other application-scoped, session-scoped objects can reference both session and application-scoped objects, and finally, request-scoped objects can reference other request, session or application-scoped objects. Also, prototype objects (and that includes all ASP.NET web pages defined within Spring.NET context) can reference singleton objects from any scope, as well as other prototype objects.
Support for ASP.NET 1.1 master pages in Spring.Web is very similar to the support for master pages in ASP.NET 2.0.
The idea is that a web developer can define a layout template for
the site as a master page and specify content place holders that other
pages can then reference and populate. A sample master page
(MasterLayout.ascx) could look like this:
<%@ Control language="c#" Codebehind="MasterLayout.ascx.cs" AutoEventWireup="false" Inherits="MyApp.Web.UI.MasterLyout" %>
<%@ Register TagPrefix="spring" Namespace="Spring.Web.UI.Controls" Assembly="Spring.Web" %>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" >
<html>
<head>
<title>Master Page</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="<%= Context.Request.ApplicationPath %>/css/styles.css">
<spring:ContentPlaceHolder id="head" runat="server"/>
</head>
<body>
<form runat="server">
<table cellPadding="3" width="100%" border="1">
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<spring:ContentPlaceHolder id="title" runat="server">
<!-- default title content -->
</spring:ContentPlaceHolder>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<spring:ContentPlaceHolder id="leftSidebar" runat="server">
<!-- default left side content -->
</spring:ContentPlaceHolder>
</td>
<td>
<spring:ContentPlaceHolder id="main" runat="server">
<!-- default main area content -->
</spring:ContentPlaceHolder>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
</body>
</html>As you can see from the above code, the master page defines the overall layout for the page, in addition to four content placeholders that other pages can override. The master page can also include default content within the placeholder that will be displayed if a derived page does not override the placeholder.
A page (Child.aspx) that uses this master page might look like this:
<%@ Register TagPrefix="spring" Namespace="Spring.Web.UI.Controls" Assembly="Spring.Web" %>
<%@ Page language="c#" Codebehind="Child.aspx.cs" AutoEventWireup="false" Inherits="ArtFair.Web.UI.Forms.Child" %>
<html>
<body>
<spring:Content id="leftSidebarContent" contentPlaceholderId="leftSidebar" runat="server">
<!-- left sidebar content -->
</spring:Content>
<spring:Content id="mainContent" contentPlaceholderId="main" runat="server">
<!-- main area content -->
</spring:Content>
</body>
</html>The <spring:Content/> control in the above
example uses the contentPlaceholderId attribute
(property) to specify exactly which placeholder from the master page is to
be overridden. Because this particular page does not define content
elements for the head and title place holders, they will be displayed
using the default content supplied in the master page.
Both the ContentPlaceHolder and
Content controls can contain any valid ASP.NET
markup: HTML, standard ASP.NET controls, user controls, etc.
![]() | VS.NET 2003 issue |
|---|---|
Technically, the |
The Spring.Web.UI.Page class exposes a
property called MasterPageFile, which can be used to
specify the master page.
The recommended way to do this is by leveraging the Spring.NET IoC container and creating definitions similar to the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<objects xmlns="http://www.springframework.net">
<object id="basePage" abstract="true">
<property name="MasterPageFile" value="~/MasterLayout.ascx"/>
</object>
<object type="Child.aspx" parent="basePage">
<!-- inject other objects that page needs -->
</object>
</objects>This approach allows application developers to change the master
page being used for a number of pages within a web application. Of
course, the master page can still be overridden on a per context or per
page basis by creating a new abstract page definition within a child
context, or by specifying the MasterPageFile property
directly.
A problem with the existing data binding support in ASP.NET is that it is one-way only. It allows application developers to bind page controls to the data model and display information from said data model, but it doesn't allow for the extraction of values from the controls when the form is submitted. Spring.Web adds such bidirectional data binding to ASP.NET by allowing developers to specify data binding rules for their page, and by automatically evaluating configured data binding rules at the appropriate time in the page's lifecycle.
ASP.NET also doesn't provide any support for model management within the postbacks. Sure, it has a ViewState management, but that takes care of the control state only and not of the state of any presentation model objects these controls might be bound to. In order to manage model within ASP.NET, developers will typically use HTTP Session object to store the model between the postbacks. This results in a decent amount of boilerplate code that can and should be eliminated, which is exactly what Spring.Web does by providing a simple set of model management methods.
Please note that in order to take advantage of the bidirectional
data binding and model management support provided by Spring.Web, you
will have to couple your presentation layer to
Spring.Web; this is because features requires you to
extend a Spring.Web.UI.Page instead of the usual
System.Web.UI.Page class.
Spring.Web data binding is very easy to use. Application developers
simply need to override the protected
InitializeDataBindings method and configure data
binding rules for the page. They also need to override three model
management methods: InitializeModel,
LoadModel and SaveModel. This is
perhaps best illustrated by an example from the SpringAir reference
application. First, let's take a look at the page markup:
<%@ Page Language="c#" Inherits="TripForm" CodeFile="TripForm.aspx.cs" %>
<asp:Content ID="body" ContentPlaceHolderID="body" runat="server">
<div style="text-align: center">
<h4><asp:Label ID="caption" runat="server"></asp:Label></h4>
<table>
<tr class="formLabel">
<td> </td>
<td colspan="3">
<spring:RadioButtonGroup ID="tripMode" runat="server">
<asp:RadioButton ID="OneWay" runat="server" />
<asp:RadioButton ID="RoundTrip" runat="server" />
</spring:RadioButtonGroup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="formLabel" align="right">
<asp:Label ID="leavingFrom" runat="server" /></td>
<td nowrap="nowrap">
<asp:DropDownList ID="leavingFromAirportCode" runat="server" />
</td>
<td class="formLabel" align="right">
<asp:Label ID="goingTo" runat="server" /></td>
<td nowrap="nowrap">
<asp:DropDownList ID="goingToAirportCode" runat="server" />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="formLabel" align="right">
<asp:Label ID="leavingOn" runat="server" /></td>
<td nowrap="nowrap">
<spring:Calendar ID="departureDate" runat="server" Width="75px" AllowEditing="true" Skin="system" />
</td>
<td class="formLabel" align="right">
<asp:Label ID="returningOn" runat="server" /></td>
<td nowrap="nowrap">
<div id="returningOnCalendar">
<spring:Calendar ID="returnDate" runat="server" Width="75px" AllowEditing="true" Skin="system" />
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="buttonBar" colspan="4">
<br/>
<asp:Button ID="findFlights" runat="server"/></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</asp:Content>
Ignore for the moment the fact that none of the label
controls have text defined, which will be described later when we discuss
localization in Spring.NET. What is important for the purposes of our
current discussion, is that we have a number of input controls defined:
tripMode radio group,
leavingFromAirportCode and
goingToAirportCode dropdowns, as well as two Spring.NET
Calendar controls, departureDate and
returnDate.
Next, let's take a look at the model we will be binding this form to:
namespace SpringAir.Domain
{
[Serializable]
public class Trip
{
// fields
private TripMode mode;
private TripPoint startingFrom;
private TripPoint returningFrom;
// constructors
public Trip()
{
this.mode = TripMode.RoundTrip;
this.startingFrom = new TripPoint();
this.returningFrom = new TripPoint();
}
public Trip(TripMode mode, TripPoint startingFrom, TripPoint returningFrom)
{
this.mode = mode;
this.startingFrom = startingFrom;
this.returningFrom = returningFrom;
}
// properties
public TripMode Mode
{
get { return this.mode; }
set { this.mode = value; }
}
public TripPoint StartingFrom
{
get { return this.startingFrom; }
set { this.startingFrom = value; }
}
public TripPoint ReturningFrom
{
get { return this.returningFrom; }
set { this.returningFrom = value; }
}
}
[Serializable]
public class TripPoint
{
// fields
private string airportCode;
private DateTime date;
// constructors
public TripPoint()
{}
public TripPoint(string airportCode, DateTime date)
{
this.airportCode = airportCode;
this.date = date;
}
// properties
public string AirportCode
{
get { return this.airportCode; }
set { this.airportCode = value; }
}
public DateTime Date
{
get { return this.date; }
set { this.date = value; }
}
}
[Serializable]
public enum TripMode
{
OneWay,
RoundTrip
}
}As you can see, Trip class uses the
TripPoint class to represent departure and return,
which are exposed as StartingFrom and
ReturningFrom properties. It also uses
TripMode enumeration to specify whether the trip is
one way or return trip, which is exposed as Mode
property.
Finally, let's see the code-behind class that ties everything together:
public class TripForm : Spring.Web.UI.Page
{
// model
private Trip trip;
public Trip Trip
{
get { return trip; }
set { trip = value; }
}
// service dependency, injected by Spring IoC container
private IBookingAgent bookingAgent;
public IBookingAgent BookingAgent
{
set { bookingAgent = value; }
}
// model management methods
protected override void InitializeModel()
{
trip = new Trip();
trip.Mode = TripMode.RoundTrip;
trip.StartingFrom.Date = DateTime.Today;
trip.ReturningFrom.Date = DateTime.Today.AddDays(1);
}
protected override void LoadModel(object savedModel)
{
trip = (Trip) savedModel;
}
protected override object SaveModel()
{
return trip;
}
// data binding rules
protected override void InitializeDataBindings()
{
BindingManager.AddBinding("tripMode.Value", "Trip.Mode");
BindingManager.AddBinding("leavingFromAirportCode.SelectedValue", "Trip.StartingFrom.AirportCode");
BindingManager.AddBinding("goingToAirportCode.SelectedValue", "Trip.ReturningFrom.AirportCode");
BindingManager.AddBinding("departureDate.SelectedDate", "Trip.StartingFrom.Date");
BindingManager.AddBinding("returnDate.SelectedDate", "Trip.ReturningFrom.Date");
}
// event handler for findFlights button, uses injected 'bookingAgent'
// service and model 'trip' object to find flights
private void SearchForFlights(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
FlightSuggestions suggestions = bookingAgent.SuggestFlights(trip);
if (suggestions.HasOutboundFlights)
{
// redirect to SuggestedFlights page
}
}
}There are quite a few things that are happening in this relatively simple piece of code, so it's worth that we spend some time on each one:
When the page is initially loaded (IsPostback ==
false), the InitializeModel method is
called which initializes the trip object by creating a new instance
and setting its properties to desired values. Right before the page
is rendered, the SaveModel method will be invoked
and whatever the value it returns will be stored within the HTTP
Session. Finally, on each postback, the LoadModel
method will be called and the value returned by the previous call to
SaveModel will be passed to it as an
argument.
In this particular case the implementation is very simple
because our whole model is just the trip object.
As such, SaveModel simply returns the
trip object and LoadModel
casts the savedModel argument to
Trip and assigns it to the
trip field within the page. In the more complex
scenarios, you will typically return a dictionary containing your
model objects from the SaveModel method, and read
the values from that dictionary within the
LoadModel.
InitializeDataBindings method defines the
binding rules for all five input controls on our form. It does so by
invoking AddBinding method on the
BindingManager exposed by the page.
AddBinding method is heavily overloaded and it
allows you to specify a binding direction and a
formatter to use in addition to the
source and target binding expressions that are
used above. We'll discuss these optional parameters shortly, but for
now let's focus on the source and target expressions.
The Data Binding framework uses Spring.NET Expression Language
to define binding expressions. In most cases, like in the example
above, both source and target expression will evaluate to a property
or a field within one of the controls or a data model. This is
always the case when you are setting a bi-directional binding, as
both binding expressions need to be "settable". What is important to
remember about InitializeDataBindings method is
that it is executed only once per page type.
Basically, all of the binding expressions are parsed the first time
the page is instantiated, and are the cached and used by all
instances of that same page type that are created at a later time.
This is done for performance reasons, as data binding expression
parsing on every postback is unnecessary and would add a significant
overhead to the overall page processing time.
If you look at the SearchForFlights event handler, you will notice that it has no dependencies on the view elements. It simply uses the injected bookingAgent service and a trip object that in order to obtain a list of suggested flights. Furthermore, if you make any modifications to the trip object within your event handler, bound controls will be updated accordingly just before the page is rendered.
This accomplishes one of the major goals we set out to achieve, allowing developers to remove view element references from the page event handlers and decouple controller-type methods from the view.
Now that you have a solid high-level picture of how Spring.NET data binding and model management are typically used in web applications, let's take a look at the details and see how data binding is actually implemented under the hood, what the extension points are, and what are some additional features that make data binding framework usable in real-world applications.
Spring.NET Data Binding framework revolves around two main
interfaces: IBinding and
IBindingContainer. The IBinding
interface is definitely the more important one of the two, as it has to
be implemented by all binding types. This interface defines several
methods, with some of them being overloaded for
convenience:
public interface IBinding
{
void BindSourceToTarget(object source, object target, ValidationErrors validationErrors);
void BindSourceToTarget(object source, object target, ValidationErrors validationErrors,
IDictionary variables);
void BindTargetToSource(object source, object target, ValidationErrors validationErrors);
void BindTargetToSource(object source, object target, ValidationErrors validationErrors,
IDictionary variables);
void SetErrorMessage(string messageId, params string[] errorProviders);
}As their names imply, BindSourceToTarget
method is used to extract and copy bound values from the source object
to the target object, while BindTargetToSource does
the opposite. Both method names and parameter types are very generic for
a good reason -- data binding framework can indeed be used to bind any
two objects. Using it to bind web forms to model objects is just one of
its possible uses, although a very common one and tightly integrated
into the Spring.NET Web Framework.
The validationErrors parameter requires further
explanation. While the data binding framework is not in any way coupled
to the data validation framework, they are in some ways related. For
example, while the data validation framework is best suited to validate
the populated model according to the business rules, the data binding
framework is in a better position to validate data types during the
binding process. However, regardless of where specific validation is
performed, all error messages should be presented to the user in a
consistent manner. In order to accomplish this, Spring.NET Web Framework
passes the same ValidationErrors instance to binding methods and to any
validators that might be executed within your event handlers. This
ensures that all error messages are stored together and are displayed
consistently to the end user, using Spring.NET validation error
controls.
The last method in the IBinding interface,
SetErrorMessage, enables this by allowing you to
specify the resource id of the error message to be displayed in the case
of binding error, as well as the list of error providers that messages
should be displayed in. We will see an example of the
SetErrorMessage usage shortly.
The IBindingContainer interface extends the
IBinding interface and adds the following
members:
public interface IBindingContainer : IBinding
{
bool HasBindings { get; }
IBinding AddBinding(IBinding binding);
IBinding AddBinding(string sourceExpression, string targetExpression);
IBinding AddBinding(string sourceExpression, string targetExpression, BindingDirection direction);
IBinding AddBinding(string sourceExpression, string targetExpression, IFormatter formatter);
IBinding AddBinding(string sourceExpression, string targetExpression, BindingDirection direction,
IFormatter formatter);
}As you can see, this interface has a number of overloaded
AddBinding methods. The first one,
AddBinding(IBinding binding) is the most generic one,
as it can be used to add any binding type to the container. The other
four are convenience methods that provide a simple way to add the most
commonly used binding type, SimpleExpressionBinding.
The SimpleExpressionBinding is what we used in the
example at the beginning of this section to bind our web form to a
Trip instance. It uses Spring.NET Expression
Language to extract and to set values within source and target objects.
We discussed sourceExpression and
targetExpression arguments earlier, so let's focus on
the remaining ones.
The direction argument determines whether the binding is
bidirectional or unidirectional. By default, all data bindings are
bidirectional unless the direction argument is set to either
BindingDirection.SourceToTarget or
BindingDirection.TargetToSource. If one of these
two values is specified, binding will be evaluated only when the
appropriate BindDirection
method is invoked, and will be completely ignored in the other
direction. This is very useful when you want to bind some information
from the model into non-input controls, such as labels.
However, unidirectional data bindings are also useful when your
form doesn't have a simple one-to-one mapping to presentation model.
In our earlier trip form example, the presentation model was
intentionally designed to allow for simple one-to-one mappings. For
the sake of discussion, let's add the Airport
class and modify our TripPoint class like
this:
namespace SpringAir.Domain
{
[Serializable]
public class TripPoint
{
// fields
private Airport airport;
private DateTime date;
// constructors
public TripPoint()
{}
public TripPoint(Airport airport, DateTime date)
{
this.airport = airport;
this.date = date;
}
// properties
public Airport Airport
{
get { return this.airport; }
set { this.airport = value; }
}
public DateTime Date
{
get { return this.date; }
set { this.date = value; }
}
}
[Serializable]
public class Airport
{
// fields
private string code;
private string name;
// properties
public string Code
{
get { return this.code; }
set { this.code = value; }
}
public string Name
{
get { return this.name; }
set { this.name = value; }
}
}
}Instead of the string property
AirportCode, our TripPoint
class now exposes an Airport property of type
Airport, which is defined above. Now we have a
problem: what used to be a simple string to string binding, with the
airport code selected in a dropdown being copied directly into the
TripPoint.AirportCode property and vice versa, now becomes a not so
simple string to Airport binding, so let's see
how we can solve this mismatch problem.
First of all, binding from the model to the control is still very straight forward. We just need to set up one-way bindings from the model to controls:
protected override void InitializeDataBindings()
{
BindingManager.AddBinding("leavingFromAirportCode.SelectedValue", "Trip.StartingFrom.Airport.Code", BindingDirection.TargetToSource);
BindingManager.AddBinding("goingToAirportCode.SelectedValue", "Trip.ReturningFrom.Airport.Code", BindingDirection.TargetToSource);
...
}All we need to do is extract airport code value from the
Trip.StartingFrom.Airport.Code instead of
Trip.StartingFrom.AirportCode. Unfortunately,
binding from the control to the model the same way won't work: we
might be able to set Code property of the
Airport object, but that will likely make the
Airport.Name property invalid. What we really want
do is find an instance of the Airport class
based on the airport code and set the
TripPoint.Airport property to it. Fortunately, this
is very simple to do with Spring.NET data binding, especially because
we already have airportDao object defined in the
Spring context, which has GetAirport(string
airportCode) finder method. All we need to do is set up data
bindings from source to target that will invoke this finder method
when evaluating the source expression. Our complete set of bindings
for these two drop down lists will then look like
this:
protected override void InitializeDataBindings()
{
BindingManager.AddBinding("@(airportDao).GetAirport(leavingFromAirportCode.SelectedValue)", "Trip.StartingFrom.Airport", BindingDirection.SourceToTarget);
BindingManager.AddBinding("leavingFromAirportCode.SelectedValue", "Trip.StartingFrom.Airport.Code", BindingDirection.TargetToSource);
BindingManager.AddBinding("@(airportDao).GetAirport(goingToAirportCode.SelectedValue)", "Trip.ReturningFrom.Airport", BindingDirection.SourceToTarget);
BindingManager.AddBinding("goingToAirportCode.SelectedValue", "Trip.ReturningFrom.Airport.Code", BindingDirection.TargetToSource);
...
}That's it -- by using two unidirectional bindings with different expressions and by leveraging the fact that expressions can reference objects defined in the Spring context, we were able to solve this non-trivial data binding problem.
The last argument to AddBinding method that
we need to discuss is a formatter argument. This
argument allows you to specify a formatter that should be used to
parse string value from the typical input control before it is bound
to the model, and to format strongly typed model value before it is
bound to the control.
You will typically use one of the formatters provided in the Spring.Globalization.Formatters namespace, but if you have requirements that cannot be satisfied by one of the standard formatters it is easy enough to write your own -- all you need to do is implement a very simple IFormatter interface:
public interface IFormatter
{
string Format(object value);
object Parse(string value);
}Standard formatters provided with Spring.NET are:
CurrencyFormatter,
DateTimeFormatter,
FloatFormatter,
IntegerFormatter,
NumberFormatter and
PercentFormatter, which should be sufficient for
most usage scenarios.
Because the data binding framework uses the same expression evaluation engine as the Spring.NET IoC container, it will use any registered type converters to perform data binding. Many type converters are included with Spring.NET (take a look at the classes in Spring.Objects.TypeConverters namespace) and automatically registered for you, but you can implement your own custom converters and register them using standard Spring.NET type converter registration mechanisms.
Spring.Web's base Page class adds two
events to the standard .NET page lifecycle -
DataBound and
DataUnbound.
The DataUnbound event is fired after the data
model has been updated using values from the controls. It is fired
right after the Load event and only on postbacks,
because it doesn't make sense to update the data model using the
controls' initial values.
The DataBound is fired after controls have
been updated using values from the data model. This happens right
before the PreRender event.
The fact that data model is updated immediately after the
Load event and that controls are updated right
before the PreRender event means that your event
handlers will be able to work with a correctly updated data model, as
they execute after the Load event, and that any
changes you make to the data model within event handlers will be
reflected in the controls immediately afterwards, as they (the
controls) are updated prior to the actual rendering.
If there are errors in the databinding, for example, trying to bind a string 'hello' to an integer property on the model, you can specify how those fundamental binding errors should be rendered. An example of this shown below taken from the WebQuickStart 'RobustEmployeeInfo' example.
[Default.aspx.cs]
protected override void InitializeDataBindings()
{
// collect txtId.Text binding errors in "id.errors" collection
BindingManager.AddBinding("txtId.Text", "Employee.Id").SetErrorMessage("ID has to be an integer", "id.errors");
...
[Default.aspx]
...
<asp:TextBox ID="txtId" runat="server" />
<!-- output validation errors from "id.errors" collection -->
<spring:ValidationError Provider="id.errors" runat="server" />
...The SetErrorMessage specifies the message text or resource id of the error message to be displayed followed by a variable length list of strings that specify the collection of error providers message where the message should be displayed. In the above case the error provider will be rendered in Spring's ValidationError User Control. See
HttpRequestListBindingContainer extracts posted raw values from the request and populates the specified IList by creating objects of the type specified and populating each of these objects according to the requestBindings collection.
Please checkout the WebQuickStart sample's demo of HttpRequestListBindingContainer. Below
protected override void InitializeDataBindings()
{
// HttpRequestListBindingContainer unbinds specified values from Request -> Productlist
HttpRequestListBindingContainer requestBindings =
new HttpRequestListBindingContainer("sku,name,quantity,price", "Products", typeof(ProductInfo));
requestBindings.AddBinding("sku", "Sku");
requestBindings.AddBinding("name", "Name");
requestBindings.AddBinding("quantity", "Quantity", quantityFormatter);
requestBindings.AddBinding("price", "Price", priceFormatter);
BindingManager.AddBinding(requestBindings);
}![]() | Note |
|---|---|
| Due to the fact, that browsers don't send the values of unchecked checkboxes, you can't use HttpRequestListBindingContainer with <input type="checkbox" > html controls. |
To simplify use of Spring's Data Binding feature on web pages and controls, Spring.Web provides a special DataBindingPanel container control. A DataBindingPanel does not render any html code itself, but allows for specifying additional, data binding related attributes to its child controls:
<%@ Page Language="C#" CodeFile="Default.aspx.cs" Inherits="DataBinding_EasyEmployeeInfo_Default" %>
<%@ Register TagPrefix="spring" Namespace="Spring.Web.UI.Controls" Assembly="Spring.Web" %>
<html>
<body>
<spring:DataBindingPanel ID="ctlDataBindingPanel" runat="server">
<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" border="0">
<tr>
<td>Employee ID:</td>
<td>
<asp:TextBox ID="txtId" runat="server" BindingTarget="Employee.Id" />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Name:</td>
<td><asp:TextBox ID="txtFirstName" runat="server" BindingTarget="Employee.FirstName" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
</spring.DataBindingPanel>
</body>
</html>Using DataBindingPanel the binding information can be specified directly on the control declaration. The following attributes are recognized by a DataBindingPanel:
BindingTarget
corresponds to the target expression used in IBindingContainer.AddBinding()
BindingSource
corresponds to the source expression used in IBindingContainer.AddBinding(). For standard controls you don't need to specify the source expression. If you are binding to some custom control, of course you must specific this attribute.
BindingDirection
one of the values of the BindingDirection enumeration
BindingFormatter
if you need a custom formatter, you can specific the object name of a formatter here. The formatter instance will be obtained by a call to IApplicationContext.GetObject() each time it is needed.
BindingType
In case you need a completely customized binding, specify its type here. Note that a custom binding type must implement the following constructor signature:
ctor(string source,string target, BindingDirection,
IFormatter)
![]() | Note |
|---|---|
| The Visual Studio Web Form Editor will of course complain about binding attributes because it doesn't know them. You can safely ignore those warnings. |
While recognizing that the .NET framework has excellent support for localization, the support within ASP.NET 1.x is somewhat incomplete.
Every .aspx page in an ASP.NET project has a
resource file associated with it, but those resources are never used (by
the current ASP.NET infrastructure). ASP.NET 2.0 will change that and
allow application developers to use local resources for pages. In the
meantime, the Spring.NET team built support for using local pages
resources into Spring.Web thus allowing application developers to start
using ASP.NET 2.0-like page resources immediately.
Spring.Web supports several different approaches to localization within a web application, which can be mixed and matched as appropriate. Both push and pull mechanisms are supported, as well as the fallback to globally defined resources when a local resource cannot be found. Spring.Web also provides support for user culture management and image localization, which are described in the later sections.
![]() | Tip |
|---|---|
Introductory material covering ASP.NET Globalization and Localization can be found at the following URLs; Globalization Architecture for ASP.NET and Localization Practices for ASP.NET 2.0 by Michele Leroux Bustamante. |
The central idea behind 'push' localization is that an application
developer should be able to specify localization resources in the
resource file for the page and have those resources automatically
applied to the user controls on the page by the framework. For example,
an application developer could define a page such as
UserRegistration.aspx...
<%@ Register TagPrefix="spring" Namespace="Spring.Web.UI.Controls" Assembly="Spring.Web" %>
<%@ Page language="c#" Codebehind="UserRegistration.aspx.cs"
AutoEventWireup="false" Inherits="ArtFair.Web.UI.Forms.UserRegistration" %>
<html>
<body>
<spring:Content id="mainContent" contentPlaceholderId="main" runat="server">
<div align="right">
<asp:LinkButton ID="english" Runat="server" CommandArgument="en-US">English</asp:LinkButton>
<asp:LinkButton ID="serbian" Runat="server" CommandArgument="sr-SP-Latn">Srpski</asp:LinkButton>
</div>
<table>
<tr>
<td><asp:Label id="emailLabel" Runat="server"/></td>
<td><asp:TextBox id="email" Runat="server" Width="150px"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><asp:Label id="passwordLabel" Runat="server"/></td>
<td><asp:TextBox id="password" Runat="server" Width="150px"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><asp:Label id="passwordConfirmationLabel" Runat="server"/></td>
<td><asp:TextBox id="passwordConfirmation" Runat="server" Width="150px"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><asp:Label id="nameLabel" Runat="server"/></td>
<td><asp:TextBox id="name" Runat="server" Width="150px"/></td>
</tr>
...
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<asp:Button id="saveButton" Runat="server"/>
<asp:Button id="cancelButton" Runat="server"/>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</spring:Content>
</body>
</html>A close inspection of the above .aspx code
reveals that none of the Label or
Button controls have had a value assigned to the
Text property. The values of the
Text property for these controls are stored in the
local resource file (of the page) using the following convention to
identify the resource (string).
$this.controlId.propertyName
The corresponding local resource file,
UserRegistration.aspx.resx, is shown below.
<root>
<data name="$this.emailLabel.Text">
<value>Email:</value>
</data>
<data name="$this.passwordLabel.Text">
<value>Password:</value>
</data>
<data name="$this.passwordConfirmationLabel.Text">
<value>Confirm password:</value>
</data>
<data name="$this.nameLabel.Text">
<value>Full name:</value>
</data>
...
<data name="$this.countryLabel.Text">
<value>Country:</value>
</data>
<data name="$this.saveButton.Text">
<value>$messageSource.save</value>
</data>
<data name="$this.cancelButton.Text">
<value>$messageSource.cancel</value>
</data>
</root>![]() | VS2003 |
|---|---|
To view the .resx file for a page, you may need to enable "Project/Show All Files" in Visual Studio. When "Show All Files" is enabled, the .resx file appears like a "child" of the code-behind page. When Visual Studio creates the .resx file, it will include a
|
![]() | VS2005 |
|---|---|
To create a resource file in VS2005, open your control or page in design mode and select "Tools/Generate local resource" from the menu |
Finally a localizer must be configured for the page to enable automatic localization:
<object id="localizer" type="Spring.Globalization.Localizers.ResourceSetLocalizer, Spring.Core"/>
<object type="UserRegistration.aspx">
<property name="Localizer" ref="localizer"/>
</object>For more information on configuring localizers see Section 22.7.3, “Working with Localizers”
The last two resource definitions from the previous section require some additional explanation:
<data name="$this.saveButton.Text">
<value>$messageSource.save</value>
</data>
<data name="$this.cancelButton.Text">
<value>$messageSource.cancel</value>
</data>In some cases it makes sense to apply a resource that is defined
globally as opposed to locally. In this example, it
makes better sense to define values for the Save and
Cancel buttons globally as they will probably be used
throughout the application.
The above example demonstrates how one can achieve that by defining a resource redirection expression as the value of a local resource by prefixing a global resource name with the following string.
$messageSource.
Taking the case of the above example, this will tell the localizer
to use the save and cancel
portions of the resource key as lookup keys to retrieve the actual
values from a global message source. The important thing to remember is
that one need only define a resource redirect once, typically in the
invariant resource file – any lookup for a resource redirect will simply
fall back to the invariant culture, and result in a global message
source lookup using the correct culture.
Global resources are (on a per-context basis) defined as a plain
vanilla object definition using the reserved name of
'messageSource', which one can add to one's
Spring.NET configuration file as shown below.
<object id="messageSource" type="Spring.Context.Support.ResourceSetMessageSource, Spring.Core">
<property name="ResourceManagers">
<list>
<value>MyApp.Web.Resources.Strings, MyApp.Web</value>
</list>
</property>
</object>![]() | NET 2.0 |
|---|---|
To use resources from your App_GlobalResources folder, specify
<value>Resources.Strings,
App_GlobalResources</value> |
The global resources are cached within the Spring.NET
IApplicationContext and are accessible through
the Spring.NET IMessageSource interface.
The Spring.Web Page and
UserControl classes have a reference to their owning
IApplicationContext and it's associated
IMessageSource. As such, they will automatically
redirect resource lookups to a global message source if a local resource
cannot be found.
Currently, the ResourceSetMessageSource is the
only message source implementation that ships with Spring.NET.
In order to apply resources automatically, a localizer needs to be
injected into all pages requiring this feature (typically accomplished
using a base page definition that other pages will inherit from). The
injected localizer will inspect the resource file when the page is first
requested, cache the resources that start with the
'$this' marker string value, and apply the values to
the controls that populate the page prior to the page being
rendered.
A localizer is simply an object that implements the
Spring.Globalization.ILocalizer interface.
Spring.Globalization.AbstractLocalizer is
provided as a convenient base class for localization: this class has one
abstract method, LoadResources. This method must load
and return a list of all the resources that must be automatically
applied from the resource store.
Spring.NET ships with one concrete implementation of a localizer,
Spring.Globalization.Localizers.ResourceSetLocalizer,
that retrieves a list of resources to apply from the local resource
file. Future releases of Spring.NET may provide other localizers that
read resources from an XML file or even a flat text file that contains
resource name-value pairs which will allow application developers to
store resources within the files in a web application instead of as
embedded resources in an assembly. Of course, if an application
developer would rather store such resources in a database, he or she can
write their own ILocalizer implementation that
will load a list of resources to apply from a database.
As mentioned previously, one would typically configure the localizer to be used within an abstract base definition for those pages that require localization as shown below.
<object id="localizer" type="Spring.Globalization.Localizers.ResourceSetLocalizer, Spring.Core"/>
<object id="basePage" abstract="true">
<description>
Pages that reference this definition as their parent
(see examples below) will automatically inherit following properties.
</description>
<property name="Localizer" ref="localizer"/>
</object>Of course, nothing prevents an application developer from defining a different localizer for each page in the application; in any case, one can always override the localizer defined in a base (page) definition. Alternatively, if one does want any resources to be applied automatically one can completely omit the localizer definition.
One last thing to note is that Spring.NET
UserControl instances will (by default) inherit
the localizer and other localization settings from the page that they
are contained within, but one can similarly also override that behavior
using explicit dependency injection.
While automatic localization as described above works great for many form-like pages, it doesn't work nearly as well for the controls defined within any iterative controls because the IDs for such iterative controls are not fixed. It also doesn't work well in those cases where one needs to display the same resource multiple times within the same page. For example, think of the header columns for outgoing and return flights tables within the SpringAir application (see Chapter 33, SpringAir - Reference Application).
In these situations, one should use a pull-style mechanism for
localization, which boils down to a simple GetMessage
call as shown below.
<asp:Repeater id="outboundFlightList" Runat="server">
<HeaderTemplate>
<table border="0" width="90%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" class="suggestedTable">
<thead>
<tr class="suggestedTableCaption">
<th colspan="6">
<%= GetMessage("outboundFlights") %>
</th>
</tr>
<tr class="suggestedTableColnames">
<th><%= GetMessage("flightNumber") %></th>
<th><%= GetMessage("departureDate") %></th>
<th><%= GetMessage("departureAirport") %></th>
<th><%= GetMessage("destinationAirport") %></th>
<th><%= GetMessage("aircraft") %></th>
<th><%= GetMessage("seatPlan") %></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
</HeaderTemplate>The GetMessage method is available within both
the Spring.Web.UI.Page and
Spring.Web.UI.UserControl classes, and it will
automatically fall back to a global message source lookup if a local
resource is not found.
Spring.Web provides an easy (and consistent) way to localize images within a web application. Unlike text resources, which can be stored within embedded resource files, XML files, or even a database, images in a typical web application are usually stored as files on the file system. Using a combination of directory naming conventions and a custom ASP.NET control, Spring.Web allows application developers to localize images within the page as easily as text resources.
The Spring.Web Page class exposes the
ImagesRoot property, which is used to define the root
directory where images are stored. The default value is 'Images', which
means that the localizer expects to find an 'Images' directory within
the application root, but one can set it to any value in the definition
of the page.
In order to localize images, one needs to create a directory for
each localized culture under the ImagesRoot directory
as shown below.
/MyApp
/Images
/en
/en-US
/fr
/fr-CA
/sr-SP-Cyrl
/sr-SP-Latn
...Once an appropriate folder hierarchy is in place all one need do
is put the localized images in the appropriate directories and make sure
that different translations of the same image are named the same. In
order to place a localized image on a page, one needs to use the
<spring:LocalizedImage> as shown below.
<%@ Page language="c#" Codebehind="StandardTemplate.aspx.cs"
AutoEventWireup="false" Inherits="SpringAir.Web.StandardTemplate" %>
<%@ Register TagPrefix="spring" Namespace="Spring.Web.UI.Controls" Assembly="Spring.Web" %>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" >
<html>
<body>
<spring:LocalizedImage id="logoImage" imageName="spring-air-logo.jpg" borderWidth="0" runat="server" />
</body>
</html>This control will find the most specific directory that contains
an image with the specified name using standard localization fallback
rules and the user's culture. For example, if the user's culture is
'en-US', the localizer will look for the
spring-air-logo.jpg file in
Images/en-US, then in Images/en
and finally, if the image file has still not been found, in the root
Images directory (which for all practical purposes
serves as an invariant culture folder).
In addition to global and local resource management, Spring.Web
also adds support for user culture management by exposing the current
CultureInfo through the
UserCulture property on the
Page and UserControl
classes.
The UserCulture property will simply delegate
culture resolution to an implementation of
Spring.Globalization.ICultureResolver interface.
One can specify exactly which culture resolver to use by configuring the
CultureResolver property of the
Page class in the relevant object definition as
shown below.
<object id="BasePage" abstract="true">
<property name="CultureResolver">
<object type="Spring.Globalization.Resolvers.CookieCultureResolver, Spring.Web"/>
</property>
</object>Several useful implementations of
ICultureResolver ship as part of Spring.Web, so
it is unlikely that application developers will have to implement their
own culture resolver. However, if one does have such a requirement, the
resulting implementation should be fairly straightforward as there are
only two methods that one need implement. The following sections discuss
each available implementation of the
ICultureResolver interface.
This is default culture resolver implementation. It will be used
if one does not specify a culture resolver for a page, or if one
explicitly injects a DefaultWebCultureResolver
into a page definition explicitly. The latter case (explicit
injection) is sometimes useful because it allows one to specify a
culture that should always be used by providing a value to the
DefaultCulture property on the resolver.
The DefaultWebCultureResolver will first
look at the DefaultCulture property and return its
value if said property value is not null. If it is null, the
DefaultWebCultureResolver will fall back to
request header inspection, and finally, if no
'Accept-Lang' request headers are present it will
return the UI culture of the currently executing thread.
This resolver works in a similar way to the
DefaultWebCultureResolver with the exception
that it always checks request headers first, and
only then falls back to the value of the
DefaultCulture property or the culture code of the
current thread.
This resolver will look for culture information in the user's
session and return it if it finds one. If not, it will fall back to
the behavior of the
DefaultWebCultureResolver.
This resolver will look for culture information in a cookie, and
return it if it finds one. If not, it will fall back to the behavior
of the DefaultWebCultureResolver.
![]() | Warning |
|---|---|
In order to work around this limitation you should use
|
In order to be able to change the culture application developers
will need to use one of the culture resolvers that support culture
changes, such as SessionCultureResolver or
CookieCultureResolver. One could also write a
custom ICultureResolver that will persist culture
information in a database, as part of a user's profile.
Once that requirement is satisfied, all that one need do is to set
the UserCulture property to a new
CultureInfo object before the page is rendered.
In the following .aspx example, there are two link
buttons that can be used to change the user's culture. In the
code-behind, this is all one need do to set the new culture. A code
snippet for the code-behind file
(UserRegistration.aspx.cs) is shown below.
protected override void OnInit(EventArgs e)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.english.Command += new CommandEventHandler(this.SetLanguage);
this.serbian.Command += new CommandEventHandler(this.SetLanguage);
base.OnInit(e);
}
private void SetLanguage(object sender, CommandEventArgs e)
{
this.UserCulture = new CultureInfo((string) e.CommandArgument);
}One of the problems evident in many ASP.NET applications is that
there is no built-in way to externalize the flow of an application. The
most common way of defining application flow is by hardcoding calls to the
Response.Redirect and
Server.Transfer methods within event handlers.
This approach is problematic because any changes to the flow of an application necessitates code changes (with the attendant recompilation, testing, redeployment, etc). A much better way, and one that has been proven to work successfully in many MVC ( Model-View-Controller) web frameworks is to provide the means to externalize the mapping of action results to target pages.
Spring.Web adds this functionality to ASP.NET by allowing one to define result mappings within the definition of a page, and to then simply use logical result names within event handlers to control application flow.
In Spring.Web, a logical result is encapsulated and defined by the
Result class; because of this one can configure
results just like any other object:
<objects xmlns="http://www.springframework.net">
<object id="homePageResult" type="Spring.Web.Support.Result, Spring.Web">
<property name="TargetPage" value="~/Default.aspx"/>
<property name="Mode" value="Transfer"/>
<property name="Parameters">
<dictionary>
<entry key="literal" value="My Text"/>
<entry key="name" value="%{UserInfo.FullName}"/>
<entry key="host" value="%{Request.UserHostName}"/>
</dictionary>
</property>
</object>
<object id="loginPageResult" type="Spring.Web.Support.Result, Spring.Web">
<property name="TargetPage" value="Login.aspx"/>
<property name="Mode" value="Redirect"/>
</object>
<object type="UserRegistration.aspx" parent="basePage">
<property name="UserManager" ref="userManager"/>
<property name="Results">
<dictionary>
<entry key="userSaved" value-ref="homePageResult"/>
<entry key="cancel" value-ref="loginPageResult"/>
</dictionary>
</property>
</object>
</objects>
The only property that you must supply a value
for each and every result is the TargetPage property.
The value of the Mode property can be either
Transfer, TransferNoPreserve,
Redirect, and defaults to Transfer
if none is specified. TransferNoPreserve issues a server-side transfer
with 'preserveForm=false', so that QueryString and Form data are not
preserved.
If one's target page requires parameters, one can define them using
the Parameters dictionary property. One simply
specifies either literal values or object
navigation expressions for such parameter values; if one specifies
an expression, this expression will be evaluated in the context of the
page in which the result is being referenced... in the specific case of
the above example, this means that any page that uses the
homePageResult needs to expose a
UserInfo property on the page class itself.
![]() | Note |
|---|---|
In Spring 1.1.0 and before the prefix used to indicate an object
navigation expression in the |
Parameters will be handled differently depending on the result mode.
For redirect results, every parameter will be converted to a string, then
URL encoded, and finally appended to a redirect query string. On the other
hand, parameters for transfer results will be added to the
HttpContext.Items collection before the request is
transferred to the target page. This means that transfers are more
flexible because any object can be passed as a parameter between pages.
They are also more efficient because they don't require a round-trip to
the client and back to the server, so transfer mode is recommended as the
preferred result mode (it is also the current default).
The above example shows independent result object definitions, which
are useful for global results such as a home- and login- page.
Result definitions that are only going to be used
by one page should be simply embedded within the definition of a page,
either as inner object definitions or using a special shortcut notation
for defining a result definition:
<object type="~/UI/Forms/UserRegistration.aspx" parent="basePage">
<property name="UserManager">
<ref object="userManager"/>
</property>
<property name="Results">
<dictionary>
<entry key="userSaved" value="redirect:UserRegistered.aspx?status=Registration Successful,user=${UserInfo}"/>
<entry key="cancel" value-ref="homePageResult"/>
</dictionary>
</property>
</object>
The short notation for the result must adhere to the following format...
[<mode>:]<targetPage>[?param1,param2,...,paramN]
There are three possible values for the mode
value referred to in the above notation snippet; they are:
redirect
transfer
TransferNoPreserve
They correspond to the values of the ResultMode enumeration. One thing to notice is that a comma is used instead of an ampersand to separate parameters; this is done so as to avoid the need for laborious ampersand escaping within an XML object definition. The use of the ampersand character is still supported if required, but one will then have to specify it using the well known & entity reference.
Once one has defined one's results, it is very simple to use them
within the event handlers of one's pages
(UserRegistration.apsx.cs)...
private void SaveUser(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
UserManager.SaveUser(UserInfo);
SetResult("userSaved");
}
public void Cancel(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SetResult("cancel");
}
protected override void OnInit(EventArgs e)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.saveButton.Click += new EventHandler(this.SaveUser);
this.cancelButton.Click += new EventHandler(this.Cancel);
base.OnInit(e);
}One could of course further refactor the above example and use defined constants. This would be a good thing to do in the case of a logical result name such as "home" that is likely to be referenced by many pages.
ASP.NET has decent support for client-side scripting through the use
of the Page.RegisterClientScriptBlock and
Page.RegisterStartupScript methods.
However, neither of these two methods allows you to output a
registered script markup within a <head> section
of a page, which is (in many cases) exactly what you would like to
do.
Spring.Web adds several methods to enhance client-side scripting
to the base Spring.Web.UI.Page class:
RegisterHeadScriptBlock and
RegisterHeadScriptFile, each with a few overrides.
You can call these methods from your custom pages and controls in order
to register script blocks and script files that must be included in the
<head> section of the final HTML page.
The only additional thing that is required to make this work is
that you use the <spring:Head> server-side
control to define your <head> section instead
of using the standard HTML <head> element. This
is shown below.
<%@ Page language="c#" Codebehind="StandardTemplate.aspx.cs"
AutoEventWireup="false" Inherits="SpringAir.Web.StandardTemplate" %>
<%@ Register TagPrefix="spring" Namespace="Spring.Web.UI.Controls" Assembly="Spring.Web" %>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" >
<html>
<spring:Head runat="server" id="Head1">
<title>
<spring:ContentPlaceHolder id="title" runat="server">
<%= GetMessage("default.title") %>
</spring:ContentPlaceHolder>
</title>
<LINK href="<%= CssRoot %>/default.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
<spring:ContentPlaceHolder id="head" runat="server"></spring:ContentPlaceHolder>
</spring:Head>
<body>
...
</body>
</html>The example above shows you how you would typically set-up a
<head> section within a master page template in
order to be able to change the title value and to add additional
elements to the <head> section from the child
pages using <spring:ContentPlaceholder>
controls. However, only the <spring:Head>
declaration is required in order for Spring.NET
Register* scripts to work properly.
In a similar fashion, you can add references to CSS files, or even
specific styles, directly to the <head> HTML
section using Page.RegisterStyle and
Page.RegisterStyleFile methods. The latter one simply
allows you to include a reference to an external CSS file, while the
former one allows you to define embedded style definitions by specifying
the style name and definition as the parameters. The final list of style
definitions registered this way will be rendered within the single
embedded style section of the final HTML
document.
In order to make the manual inclusion of client-side scripts, CSS
files and images easier, the Spring.Web Page class
exposes several properties that help you reference such artifacts using
absolute paths. This affords web application developers a great deal of
convenience functionality straight out of the box if they stick to
common conventions such as a web application (directory)
structure..
These properties are ScriptsRoot,
CssRoot and ImagesRoot. They have
default values of Scripts, CSS and
Images, which will work just fine if you create and
use these directories in your web application root. However, if you
prefer to place them somewhere else, you can always override default
values by injecting new values into your page definitions (you will
typically inject these values only in the base page definition, as they
are normally shared by all the pages in the application). An example of
such configuration is shown below:
<object id="basePage" abstract="true">
<description>
Convenience base page definition for all the pages.
Pages that reference this definition as their parent (see the examples below)
will automatically inherit the following properties....
</description>
<property name="CssRoot" value="Web/CSS"/>
<property name="ImagesRoot" value="Web/Images"/>
</object>
Spring provides several custom user controls that are located in the
Spring.Web.UI.Controls namespace. This section
primarily lists the controls and points to other documentation to provide
additional information. There are a few other controls not documented
here, please check the SDK docs for their descriptions.
The location in the web page where validation errors are to be rendered can be specifies by using the ValidationSummary and ValidationError controls. There are two controls since they have different defaults for how errors are rendered. ValidationSummary is used to display potentially multiple errors identified by the validation framework. ValidationError is used to display field-level validation errors. Please refer to the validation section ASP.NET usage tips for more information.
Some standard controls are not easy to use with Spring's
databinding support. Examples are check boxes and ratio button groups.
In this case you should use the CheckBoxList and
RadioButtonGroup controls. Databinding itself can
be done using the DataBindingPanel instead of the
using the BindingManager API within the code behind page.
A pop-up DHTML calendar control is provided. It is a slightly modified version of the Dynarch.com DHTML Calendar control written by Mihai Bazon.
You can suppress dependency injection for controls inside your ASP.NET by using the Panel control. See the section Customizing control dependency injection for more information.